Re: git-subtree Ready #2
- From
David A. Greene <greened@obbligato.org>
- Date
- Mar 2, 2012, 03:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87mx7zk6s2.fsf@smith.obbligato.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vobsk56md.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> and everybody (including me) now favors to have the history. > > So the answer to your question is yes, but I do not think we heard opinion > from anybody regarding the question by Avery yet. I personally do not see > how it would help us if the old history is rewritten at this point.
Looks like eveyone's on board to keep the history as-is. I cleaned a few things up and will re-post the subtree once the test-lib.sh changes go through.
-Dave