Re: git-subtree Ready #2
- From
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 24, 2012, 23:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAHqTa-1fbi5W7R2fLu3bp7Yuv_ZB9nxhgjHkLGuU8-V4016+JA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vobsox84l.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> writes: >> Overall I agree that there's little benefit in preserving the history, >> at least as far as I can see, *except* that some code changes were >> submitted by people other than me and squashing those changes might >> conceivably cause licensing confusion down the road. > > That is a good point, and it sounds like a good enough justification to > merge with history, at least for me.
Should we filter-branch or rebase the history first, or just leave it as is?
Like I said, since I don't expect there to be any more back-and-forth development, rebasing should be pretty harmless.
Avery