From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:00:41 GMT
Subject: Re: git-subtree Ready #2
Message-ID: <7vy5rrfft2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <87hayfv75y.fsf@smith.obbligato.org>

greened@obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes:

> Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Should we filter-branch or rebase the history first, or just leave it as is?
>>
>> Like I said, since I don't expect there to be any more back-and-forth
>> development, rebasing should be pretty harmless.
>
> Catching up on e-mail.  :)
>
> I'm happy to do either (rebase or filter-branch).  Just let me know.

I would understand Avery's "should we filter-branch/rebase, or is it OK
as-is?", but I do not understand what you mean by "either rebase or
filter-branch is fine".

> I'm about the send the test-lib.sh patch separately...

Thanks, this I understand and should not be a part of git-subtree topic.