Re: [PATCH][RFC] Add git-archive-tree
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Sep 4, 2006, 22:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwt8jl1dv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <44FCA272.7040907@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano schrieb: >... > Well, this is just _one_ of the positions I've taken on this topic, I > have to admit. Franck then convinced me that merging downloader and > archiver into one command is nice for users (less commands to remember, > keeps existing --remote option) even if it doesn't make sense > technically, because their implementations have nothing in common.
Ah, I was not following the thread closely and I agree with you and Franck now in that smaller number of commands the better. (IOW, download-archive in my 3-item list is not needed in the end user UI and can be implemented as "git-archive-tree --remote=<repo>).
Thanks for clarification.