Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Improved infrastructure for refname normalization
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 12, 2011, 16:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwrdd90df.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4E6E2122.8000201@alum.mit.edu>
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> OTOH I am again having serious doubts that trying to support > unnormalized refnames is a good idea.
Sorry, I am confused. I thought the way you are planning forward is to leave unnormalized ones unchecked as the current code does (and mark the places that do so with _unsafe()), with the eventual goal of fixing the caller to pass only normalized ones to make call to the "safe" version?