From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:44:12 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Improved infrastructure for refname normalization
Message-ID: <7vwrdd90df.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E6E2122.8000201@alum.mit.edu>

Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:

> OTOH I am again having serious doubts that trying to support
> unnormalized refnames is a good idea.

Sorry, I am confused. I thought the way you are planning forward is to
leave unnormalized ones unchecked as the current code does (and mark the
places that do so with _unsafe()), with the eventual goal of fixing the
caller to pass only normalized ones to make call to the "safe" version?