Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Improved infrastructure for refname normalization
- From
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
- Date
- Sep 12, 2011, 15:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4E6E2122.8000201@alum.mit.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vehzmbd0o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 09/12/2011 06:28 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> There were a few minor things that looked worth mentioning while
> reviewing, though.
>
> - (style) You seem to be fond of pre-increment a lot, but in general our
> codebase prefers post-increment especially when the end result does not
> make any difference, e.g.
>
> for (i = 1; ...; ++i) {
> ...OK, changed.
> - (series structure) It might make the series progress easier to follow > if you introduced check_ref_format_unsafe() in the same commit where > you change check_ref_format() to take flags parameter.
OK. I'll take the opportunity to rename the functions to check_refname_format*(), to make it more obvious that they only concern themselves with the refnames and not the references themselves.
I discovered a bug in my code for handling refnames without normalization; I will also fix that in v3.
OTOH I am again having serious doubts that trying to support unnormalized refnames is a good idea. I will write more when I have time to argue my case.
Michael
-- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/