Re: [PATCH/RFC] rev-list: add --authorship-order alternative ordering
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 6, 2013, 19:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vtxlbxcl7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPZ477OFM6D4n_Wz-OozN=aYn5-LmNA2ggL+9GNrbGrRQh9pRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Elliott Cable <me@ell.io> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> elliottcable <me@ell.io> writes: >>> Thus, I've added an --authorship-order version of --date-order, which relies >>> upon the AUTHOR_DATE instead of the COMMITTER_DATE; this means that old commits >>> will continue to show up chronologically in-order despite rebasing. >>> --- >> >> Missing sign-off. Please see Documentation/SubmittingPatches. > > Will-do. > > I read that part, and was rather confused. At no point did I get the > idea that I should sign-off *my own initial commit*. Perhaps that part > of the documentation needs to be slightly re-written? Would that be a > welcome change?
I fail to see what more needs to be clarified on top of what we already have; please re-read "(5) Sign your work" section, paying with special attention to:
- "YOU WROTE IT or otherwise have the right to pass it on".
- "the contribution was created in whole or in part BY ME and I HAVE THE RIGHT TO SUBMIT".
But perhaps you meant something else by "*my own initial commit*"???