Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] rebase -i: write better reflog messages

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Jun 18, 2013, 20:55 UTC
Message-ID: <7vsj0f2l6z.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0==+Zs-Ej92VsHnF60_=RTigkKo+3xLew3JdavC3fbzoA@mail.gmail.com>

Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:

Show 11 quoted lines

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Why did this have to change back from branch-reflog-test to branch1
>> (which I used by mistake in "how about this" patch, but fixed in the
>> version queued on 'pu')?
>>
>> The reason I did not use 'branch1' in the version I queued on 'pu'
>> is because rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query, when merged on top of
>> this, makes an assumption on where branch1 is in the test and
>> fliping its tip here will break it.
>
> Oh, okay.  Then just tweak before applying, if you don't mind?

Sorry, you've already used my time allotment for this week.