Re: [PATCH 3/3] Tie it all together: "git log"
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Feb 28, 2006, 22:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr75nm8cl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602281251390.22647@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
> Anyway, apart from that issue (which I think should be trivial to sort out > if we accept breaking --merge-order), the rest looks like it should just > get more testing and handling of the few missing flags from rev-parse in > revision.c, and it should be good.
I would say we should just rip merge-order out. Who uses it, and why does it not work with topo-order, again?