From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:22:50 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Tie it all together: "git log"
Message-ID: <7vr75nm8cl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602281251390.22647@g5.osdl.org>

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:

> Anyway, apart from that issue (which I think should be trivial to sort out 
> if we accept breaking --merge-order), the rest looks like it should just 
> get more testing and handling of the few missing flags from rev-parse in 
> revision.c, and it should be good.

I would say we should just rip merge-order out.  Who uses it,
and why does it not work with topo-order, again?