Re: [PATCH 1/5] Introduces for_each_revision() helper
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Apr 30, 2007, 23:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vps5lbgd3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070429070616.GV5942@spearce.org>
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> But in_merge_base is heavyweight if the two commits are in the > same object database, but aren't connected at all. You'll need > to traverse both histories before aborting and saying there is > no merge base. That ain't cheap on large trees. But its also a > single line of code.
Who said anything about "a single line of code"? That is quite different from heaviness hidden in a control structure lookalike.