From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:47:51 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] sequencer: Expose API to cherry-picking machinery
Message-ID: <7vk4ajo6hk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110811215650.GA13839@elie.gateway.2wire.net>

Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:

> Another thought.  I wonder if it's possible to leave
> sequencer_parse_args() private to builtin/revert.c, making the split
> a little more logical:
>
>  - the builtin takes responsibility for its commandline interface
>  - the library takes over once the builtin has figured out what the
>    user wanted.

That's a very natural separation of tasks.