Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add a lot of dummy returns to avoid warnings with NO_NORETURN
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> I would need to clarify with s/introduce noise/introduce more noise/; the
>> existing codebase is not noise-free.
>>
>> But I do not see much point in making things worse, only to squelch
>> "reaches end of non void function" warnings that will be given under the
>> NO_NORETURN workaround configuration.
>
> Can you please give specific guidance what I should do to make
> the patchkit acceptable?
I am inclined to apply only 1 and 3, which is what I already have on 'pu'.