Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add a lot of dummy returns to avoid warnings with NO_NORETURN
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 20, 2011, 22:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110620223156.GA695@elie>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110620220347.GE32765@one.firstfloor.org>
Hi Andi,
Andi Kleen wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> Sorry, I do not recall suggesting to add these dummy returns. The NO_NORETURN >> workaround (your [1/3]) is what I remember. > > It was just a logical followup to quelch the warning storm NO_NORETURN > caused.
Please remember to think for yourself. ;-) Junio generally gives good advice, but if you don't see the wisdom in it, that's the time to ask questions, not blindly do a wrong thing.
In this case, since the NO_NORETURN knob is to work around a gcc bug, wouldn't it make sense to add a -Wno-something-or-other option to BASIC_CFLAGS or COMPAT_CFLAGS when it is set?
Hope that helps, Jonathan