Re: [PATCH 3/4] t5510: ensure we stay in the toplevel test dir

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> writes:
>>
>>> The last test descended into a subdir without ever re-emerging, which
>>> is not so nice to the next test writer.
>>
>> True.  Making the test suite more robust like this patch does is very much
>> appreciated.
>>
>> Is there a reason why we shouldn't be sticking to the more usual
>>
>> 	mkdir dups &&
>>         (
>>         	cd dups &&
>>                 do whatever in dups
>> 	)
>>
>> pattern?
>
> None in particular.  It would also perhaps reduce the churn since (as it
> touches every line anyway) it could be squashed with 2/4.  Should I reroll?