From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:32:46 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] t5510: ensure we stay in the toplevel test dir Message-ID: <7vaa40kl4h.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <871upcht2h.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch> Thomas Rast writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> Thomas Rast writes: >> >>> The last test descended into a subdir without ever re-emerging, which >>> is not so nice to the next test writer. >> >> True. Making the test suite more robust like this patch does is very much >> appreciated. >> >> Is there a reason why we shouldn't be sticking to the more usual >> >> mkdir dups && >> ( >> cd dups && >> do whatever in dups >> ) >> >> pattern? > > None in particular. It would also perhaps reduce the churn since (as it > touches every line anyway) it could be squashed with 2/4. Should I reroll? No. I was just curious.