Re: jk/tag-contains: stalled

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Aug 5, 2010, 22:15 UTC
Message-ID: <7v4of8d7u2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <201008052338.16668.trast@student.ethz.ch>

Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> writes:

Show 8 quoted lines

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> *1* Also we would want to do something similar to the commit.util field so
>> that more than one utility libraries can attach their own stuff to each
>> commit.  It _might_ make sense to instead get rid of commit.util and
>> migrate the users to a separate "one object hash per one type of info",
>> though.  In any case it is a separate topic.
>
> I thought this already existed in decorate.c?

Yes, the point is that there may be cases where it may be better to migrate some current commit.util users to that API.