Re: jk/tag-contains: stalled
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 5, 2010, 17:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100805173635.GA15760@sigill>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vhbj9dm6h.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:05:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> >>> * jk/tag-contains (2010-07-05) 4 commits > >>> - Why is "git tag --contains" so slow? > >>> - default core.clockskew variable to one day > >>> - limit "contains" traversals based on commit timestamp > >>> - tag: speed up --contains calculation > [...] > > I agree in principle; the log messages need to be cleaned up first > > at the least, though. > > To reduce the risk of double-work, I need to clarify. > > I meant to say that I can find enough material, especially what Peff > wrote, in the discussion that followed in the thread to do the clean-up > myself. No need to resend by anybody unless there are material > differences from what have been discussed so far that need to be > incorporated in the final series.
The only bad log message should be the final one, which should be dropped anyway. I would recommend just merging the first two for now, and Ted can tweak his core.clockskew manually.
-Peff