Re: GC of alternate object store
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 29, 2012, 15:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v3935y9tw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120829074249.GA14408@ugly.local>
Oswald Buddenhagen <ossi@kde.org> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:19:53PM +0200, Hallvard Breien Furuseth wrote: > ... >> Junio's proposal partially fixes that: It pushes refs/* instead of >> refs/heads/*, to refs/remotes/<borrowing repo>/. However... >> > i did exacty that. the tags are *still* not populated - git just tries > very hard to treat them specially.
Just this part (I won't comment on the other parts in this discussion).
Doesn't
git push $over_there 'refs/*:refs/remotes/mine/*'
push your tag v1.0 to refs/remotes/mine/v1.0 over there? The version of git I ship seems to do this just fine.
> and the "stash" file is also ignored, unfortunately.
There is a work in progress to do this on 'pu'.