Re: [PATCH 2/2] fetch: use argv_array instead of hand-building arrays
- From
Jens Lehmann <jens.lehmann@web.de>
- Date
- Sep 1, 2012, 14:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <50421CF8.60703@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120901112735.GB19163@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Am 01.09.2012 13:27, schrieb Jeff King:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Fetch invokes itself recursively when recursing into > submodules or handling "fetch --multiple". In both cases, it > builds the child's command line by pushing options onto a > statically-sized array. In both cases, the array is > currently just big enough to handle the largest possible > case. However, this technique is brittle and error-prone, so > let's replace it with a dynamic argv_array. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> > --- > Not very well tested by me, but hopefully it is simple enough that I > managed not to screw it up.
This is definitely an improvement, and I can't spot any problems either.
> It may be that fetch_populated_submodules would also benefit from > conversion (here I just pass in the argc and argv separately), but I > didn't look.
Yes, it does some similar brittle stuff and should be changed to use the argv-array too. I'll look into that.