From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:52:27 GMT
Subject: Re: GC of alternate object store
Message-ID: <7v3935y9tw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120829074249.GA14408@ugly.local>

Oswald Buddenhagen <ossi@kde.org> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:19:53PM +0200, Hallvard Breien Furuseth wrote:
> ...
>> Junio's proposal partially fixes that: It pushes refs/* instead of
>> refs/heads/*, to refs/remotes/<borrowing repo>/.  However...
>> 
> i did exacty that. the tags are *still* not populated - git just tries
> very hard to treat them specially.

Just this part (I won't comment on the other parts in this discussion).

Doesn't

	git push $over_there 'refs/*:refs/remotes/mine/*'

push your tag v1.0 to refs/remotes/mine/v1.0 over there?  The
version of git I ship seems to do this just fine.

> and the "stash" file is also ignored, unfortunately.

There is a work in progress to do this on 'pu'.