Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list
- From
- phillip.wood123@gmail.com <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 25, 2024, 14:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <62966a75-45fb-48ca-9ed2-6ff683de09c4@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <3bd7cd08-61b6-4b57-a293-1c94eb3529d7@app.fastmail.com>
Hi Kristoffer
On 25/11/2024 10:52, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024, at 11:07, phillip.wood123@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi Phillip, thanks for the review!
You're welcome, thanks for fixing this
Show 19 quoted lines
>>> + that hash3’s commit message should be used for the resulting commit. >>> + So the user is presented with an editor where the two first commit >>> + messages are commented out and the third is not. >> >> I'd perhaps say >> >> If there are conflicts when applying commit hash3 then the user is >> presented ... >> >> as we only show all the messages to the user when there are conflicts. > > I use `fixup -c` for the third/last commit here. So I am prompted to > edit the commit message. I tested this on this series: > > git checkout --detach kh/sequencer-comment-char > git rebase -i fd3785337beb285ed7fd67ce6fc3d3bed2097b40 > > Which gave me [this] editor without these changes (with > `core.commentChar` set to `%`).
Oh, I see the same thing, I was sure we only showed the final message unless there were conflicts. I wonder if I've misremembered or the behavior has changed in any case that's outside the scope of this series.
Thanks
Phillip
Show 88 quoted lines
>> >>> However this does >>> + not work if `core.commentChar`/`core.commentString` is in use since >>> + the comment char is hardcoded (#) in this `sequencer.c` function. >>> + As a result the first commit message will not be commented out. >>> + >>> + † 1: See 9e3cebd97cb (rebase -i: add fixup [-C | -c] command, >>> + 2021-01-29) >>> + >>> + Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> >>> Co-authored-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> >>> + Reported-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> >> >> Thanks for updating the trailers, they look good to me >> >> Best Wishes >> >> Phillip > > † this: > > % This is a combination of 3 commits. > % This is the 1st commit message: > > sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly > > `git rebase --update-ref` does not insert commands for dependent/sub- > branches which are checked out.[1] Instead it leaves a comment about > that fact. The comment char is hardcoded (#). In turn the comment > line gets interpreted as an invalid command when `core.commentChar`/ > `core.commentString` is in use. > > † 1: See 900b50c242 (rebase: add --update-refs option, 2022-07-19) > > Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> > > % The commit message #2 will be skipped: > > % sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly > % > % `git revert --reference <commit>` leaves behind a comment in the > % first line:[1] > % > % # *** SAY WHY WE ARE REVERTING ON THE TITLE LINE *** > % > % Meaning that the commit will just consist of the next line if the user > % exits the editor directly: > % > % This reverts commit <--format=reference commit> > % > % But the comment char here is hardcoded (#). Which means that the > % comment line will inadvertently be included in the commit message if > % `core.commentChar`/`core.commentString` is in use. > % > % † 1: See 43966ab3156 (revert: optionally refer to commit in the > % "reference" format, 2022-05-26) > % > % Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> > > % This is the commit message #3: > > sequencer: comment commit messages properly > > The rebase todo editor has commands like `fixup -c` which affects > the commit messages of the rebased commits.[1] For example: > > pick hash1 <msg> > fixup hash2 <msg> > fixup -c hash3 <msg> > > This says that hash2` and hash3 should be squashed into hash1 and > that hash3’s commit message should be used for the resulting commit. > So the user is presented with an editor where the two first commit > messages are commented out and the third is not. However this does > not work if `core.commentChar`/`core.commentString` is in use since > the comment char is hardcoded (#) in this `sequencer.c` function. > As a result the first commit message will not be commented out. > > † 1: See 9e3cebd97cb (rebase -i: add fixup [-C | -c] command, > 2021-01-29) > > Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> > Co-authored-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> > Reported-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> > Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name> > > % Please enter the commit message for your changes. Lines starting