Re: [PATCH v1 6/6] Unit tests for V2 porcelain status
- From
Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 20, 2016, 15:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <578F9923.3000403@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1468966258-11191-7-git-send-email-jeffhost@microsoft.com>
W dniu 2016-07-20 o 00:10, Jeff Hostetler pisze:
Show 8 quoted lines
> +test_expect_success pre_initial_commit_0 ' > + printf "## branch: (initial) master\n" >expected && > + printf "?? actual\n" >>expected && > + printf "?? dir1/\n" >>expected && > + printf "?? expected\n" >>expected && > + printf "?? file_x\n" >>expected && > + printf "?? file_y\n" >>expected && > + printf "?? file_z\n" >>expected &&
Why not use heredoc syntax (cat <<\EOF), or prepare a file with expected output in the testsuite?
-- Jakub Narębski