Show 23 quoted lines
> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> +#define OPT_CONTAINS(filter, h) \
>> + { OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "contains", (filter), N_("commit"), (h), \
>> + PARSE_OPT_LASTARG_DEFAULT, \
>> + parse_opt_with_commit, (intptr_t) "HEAD" \
>> + }
>> +#define OPT_WITH(filter, h) \
>> + { OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "with", (filter), N_("commit"), (h), \
>> + PARSE_OPT_LASTARG_DEFAULT, \
>> + parse_opt_with_commit, (intptr_t) "HEAD" \
>> + }
>
> The redundancy bothers me. Can't we do a bit better than that,
> perhaps like this?
>
> #define _OPT_CONTAINS_OR_WITH(name, variable, help) \
> { OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, name, (variable), N_("commit"), (help), \
> PARSE_OPT_LASTARG_DEFAULT, \
> parse_opt_with_commit, (intptr_t) "HEAD" \
> }
> #define OPT_CONTAINS(v, h) _OPT_CONTAINS_OR_WITH("contains", v, h)
>