Re: [PATCH 0/2] Breaking the ref-transactions-reflog series in smaller parts
- From
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
- Date
- Nov 20, 2014, 11:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <546DCA85.8060806@alum.mit.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <1416433224-29763-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com>
On 11/19/2014 10:40 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> so I think the patch series ref-transactions-reflog[1] sent previously to the list > is still too large for easy review and I want to break it up more. > So in this series we'll digest only 2 small patches, which do not seem to be > controversial (yet;) and seem to be useful no matter how the discussion on > the other series continues. > > ref_transaction_create as well as ref_transaction_delete are just special cases > of ref_transaction_update, so let's reduce some redundant code. While this doesn't > change code in pathes, which are supposed to be run, we do have slight changes > in error messages starting with "BUG: ". So in the best case, the user will never > see these messages at all.
Users should *never* see error messages starting with "BUG: ". These are basically what the Git project uses instead of assert(). As long as we Git developers would understand a bug report submitted by a user who sees such an error message, their text can be changed without worries.
Both patches are
Reviewed-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
And I love that you are proceeding in smaller pieces.
Michael
-- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu