Re: [PATCH 1/4] editorconfig: set maximum line length to 120 characters
- From
Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 27, 2025, 15:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4xcovwt5f2garsngqtzzcrn7755in4xkq6zxxk5smeo4d2vfp4@l7cqb2lizf65>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOLa=ZR_ZhjxYgN4pZsjOuC52PZjGMCzLJVZbwGQb=Q9W-0HSQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 25/06/27 01:51AM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 25/06/25 06:43PM, Karthik Nayak wrote: > >> As per 'Documentation/CodingGuidelines', we try to keep to at most 80 > >> characters per line. However, there are often certain cases where we > >> extend this for the sake of readability. > >> > >> Add a maximum limit of 120 characters to the '.editorconfig'. This means > >> that if an individual line exceeds 120 characters, the editor will wrap > >> that line. This provides a lot wiggle room over the recommended 80 > >> character limit. > > > > Hello Justin, > > > I frequently use the format operator in vim to reformat entire blocks of > > text and it is commonly configured to use `max_line_length` from an > > `.editorconfig` file to know when to wrap lines. Changing the value to > > 120 would cause my editor to prefer 120 character lines when > > reformatting, which I would personally not like. > > > > It would only wrap lines longer than 120 columns. Currently editorconfig > doesn't wrap any line length. So we're essentially saying, any line > above 120 is not something we want to accept and hence wrap. This > doesn't mean that shorter lines will be combined together. Wouldn't this > be better than the current situation?
When `max_line_length` is set in a ".editorconfig" file, in my vim editor it overrides the `textwidth` configuration which was already set to 80 by default. So changing to 120 would change line wrapping behavior for me at least. I could disable using the ".editorconfig", but I would prefer to avoid doing that :)
-Justin