Show 14 quoted lines
> El 11/06/2010, a las 16:34, PJ Hyett escribió:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
>>>> If its really a problem, maybe "remote: " prefix should turn into
>>>> something shorter and language agnostic, like "<< ". But thus far
>>>> we hadn't had to worry about it, since we didn't have translation
>>>> support in Git... (though yes, I see that is changing now).
>>>>
>> I'm also in favor of making the default '>>' instead of 'remote:' if
>> nothing isn't an option.
>
> Funny, as '>>' is basically meaningless. At least 'remote:' has semantic value (ie. it indicates _where_ something is coming from).