From: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:54:42 GMT
Subject: Re: Git sideband hook output
Message-ID: <4C12B0A2.4020205@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3B9F4351-4608-455E-B433-A5337A946F8A@wincent.com>

Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
> El 11/06/2010, a las 16:34, PJ Hyett escribió:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
>>>> If its really a problem, maybe "remote: " prefix should turn into
>>>> something shorter and language agnostic, like "<< ".  But thus far
>>>> we hadn't had to worry about it, since we didn't have translation
>>>> support in Git...  (though yes, I see that is changing now).
>>>>
>> I'm also in favor of making the default '>>' instead of 'remote:' if
>> nothing isn't an option.
> 
> Funny, as '>>' is basically meaningless. At least 'remote:' has semantic value (ie. it indicates _where_ something is coming from).

Seconded.