Re: Git sideband hook output

From: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Date: Jun 11, 2010, 14:45 UTC
Message-ID: <3B9F4351-4608-455E-B433-A5337A946F8A@wincent.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikYBB1DsGRRsu4pSNr1j8fFXD-99c4lRAaBqd3M@mail.gmail.com>

El 11/06/2010, a las 16:34, PJ Hyett escribió:

Show 12 quoted lines

> Hi,
> 
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> If its really a problem, maybe "remote: " prefix should turn into
>>> something shorter and language agnostic, like "<< ".  But thus far
>>> we hadn't had to worry about it, since we didn't have translation
>>> support in Git...  (though yes, I see that is changing now).
>>> 
> 
> I'm also in favor of making the default '>>' instead of 'remote:' if
> nothing isn't an option.

Funny, as '>>' is basically meaningless. At least 'remote:' has semantic value (ie. it indicates _where_ something is coming from).

Wincent