From: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:21:55 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH (v2) 2/2] rebase -i: teach --onto A...B syntax
Message-ID: <4B47BE13.7070509@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fabb9a1e1001081237n11fa61b5m63fa46fac2ad8d4a@mail.gmail.com>

Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> Heya,
> 
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:31, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks, I didn't know about that one.  But my general point is still:
>> we seem to have two implementations when the functionality of one is
>> actually a superset of the other.  As far as I can see, anyway.  So
>> the obvious way to reduce the duplicated code is to simply eliminate
>> the less-featureful implementation.
> 
> *cough* git sequencer *cough*
> 

*cough* not in my ${PATH} *cough*