Re: [PATCH] remote show: fix the -n option
- From
- Olivier Marin <dkr+ml.git@free.fr>
- Date
- Jun 9, 2008, 14:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <484D3C90.2050009@free.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0806090551070.1783@racer>
Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
> > For me, a dry run is something that avoids the high-cost operations.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_Run_(testing) http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/dryrun?view=uk http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861689507/dry_run.html
It's more "do something as it was for real but it's not". It has nothing to do with high-cost operations or something like that.
Yes?
> I would not like to remove the got_states. I think this is the wrong > direction. Rather change the die() into a return error().
OK, I will try that.
-- Olivier.