From: Olivier Marin Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:22:08 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote show: fix the -n option Message-ID: <484D3C90.2050009@free.fr> In-Reply-To: Johannes Schindelin a écrit : > > For me, a dry run is something that avoids the high-cost operations. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_Run_(testing) http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/dryrun?view=uk http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861689507/dry_run.html It's more "do something as it was for real but it's not". It has nothing to do with high-cost operations or something like that. Yes? > I would not like to remove the got_states. I think this is the wrong > direction. Rather change the die() into a return error(). OK, I will try that. -- Olivier.