Re: [PATCH v2] remote show: fix the -n option
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jun 9, 2008, 17:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0806091856180.1783@racer>
- In-Reply-To
- <484D6128.1010800@freesurf.fr>
Hi,
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Olivier Marin wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin a écrit : > > > > And I do not like this change either. It proliferates the "we just > > die() and do not care about reusing the code where die()ing is not > > desired" paradigm. > > I agree and I'm OK to try to do something about that. But not in that patch. > > This patch is just to fix a regression.
But did you not now make it harder to fix "that"? By relying on the die() behaviour in your regression fix?
Whatever, Dscho