Re: git /objects directory created 755 by default?
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 21, 2005, 05:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90512202115o652d8e00v86182302513d1319@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vacevdoti.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On 12/21/05, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> [PATCH] Force group writable umask in git-shell > > Usually I do not like hardcoded policy in programs, but use of > git-shell is already a policy decision by the repository > administrator to use the shared repository style of development, > and I cannot think of a reason to forbid group (and self, but > that is obvious) writability in such use scenario.
Could git-shell also be used by a SourceForge-like project, offering per-developer git repositories? If they are using the (BSDish?) convention of not having a group per user this could backfire.
Does any unix these days _not_ use a group per user?
cheers,
martin