Re: Make "git clone" less of a deathly quiet experience

From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Date: Feb 12, 2006, 11:02 UTC
Message-ID: <43EF15D1.1050609@op5.se>
In-Reply-To: <1139717510.4183.34.camel@evo.keithp.com>

Keith Packard wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 04:43 +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> 
> 
>>A weird oddity; Cloning is faster over rsync, day-to-day pulling is not.
> 
> 
> Precisely. If the protocol could deliver existing packs instead of
> unpacking and repacking them, then git would be as fast as rsync and I
> wouldn't have to worry about supporting two protocols.
>

Caching features have been discussed, but that means the daemon needs to have write-access to some directory within the repository. It would also work poorly for projects that see very rapid development unless the cached pack-files can be amended to. A sort of "create packs on demand". It shouldn't be too difficult, really.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231