Re: Make "git clone" less of a deathly quiet experience
- From
Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
- Date
- Feb 11, 2006, 19:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1139685031.4183.31.camel@evo.keithp.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602110943170.3691@g5.osdl.org>
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 09:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> More importantly, it really wouldn't have helped that much in this > situation. At least for me, the network is 90% of the problem, the > pack-file generation is at most 10%. So cached packfiles really only > matter for server-side problems (high CPU load, or lack of memory, or > heavy disk activity).
I'd like to see git use less CPU than CVS does on my distribution host; some mechanism for re-using either existing or cached packs would help a whole lot with that. The alternative is to see people switch to rsync instead, which seems like a far worse idea.
-- keith.packard@intel.com