Re: Make "git clone" less of a deathly quiet experience

From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Date: Feb 12, 2006, 03:43 UTC
Message-ID: <43EEAEF3.7040202@op5.se>
In-Reply-To: <1139685031.4183.31.camel@evo.keithp.com>

Keith Packard wrote:

Show 15 quoted lines

> On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 09:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
>>More importantly, it really wouldn't have helped that much in this 
>>situation. At least for me, the network is 90% of the problem, the 
>>pack-file generation is at most 10%. So cached packfiles really only 
>>matter for server-side problems (high CPU load, or lack of memory, or 
>>heavy disk activity).
> 
> 
> I'd like to see git use less CPU than CVS does on my distribution host;
> some mechanism for re-using either existing or cached packs would help a
> whole lot with that. The alternative is to see people switch to rsync
> instead, which seems like a far worse idea.   
>

A weird oddity; Cloning is faster over rsync, day-to-day pulling is not.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231