Re: Make "git clone" less of a deathly quiet experience
- From
Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
- Date
- Feb 12, 2006, 21:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1139778267.4183.66.camel@evo.keithp.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <43EF15D1.1050609@op5.se>
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 12:02 +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Caching features have been discussed, but that means the daemon needs to > have write-access to some directory within the repository.
Caching seems a bit dicey to me; security concerns and all. I would much rather have it discover packs on disk that provided a subset of the necessary objects; repository cloning would then be a process of delivering any available packs and then packing up the remaining objects. Clever administration of the repository could then construct a single pack of 'historical' data followed by periodic packs of incremental data.
Yeah, I know, I should just implement this and see how well it works in
practice. I apologize for thinking in public.
-- keith.packard@intel.com