Re: Friendly refspecs (Was: Re: git annoyances)
- From
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 9, 2008, 20:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <32541b130804091332g539037d9x7f135a27ec25b888@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080409200836.GA19248@mithlond>
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> wrote:
> So would it be any good if "git fetch <URL>" without refpecs would use > +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/<name>/* ? In any case the current behaviour > seems quite unfriendly.
But what should <name> be if you didn't provide it by doing git-remote-add? I think the lack of an obvious name for them is exactly why the branch names don't get created automatically.
Avery