Re: Friendly refspecs
- From
- Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>
- Date
- Apr 23, 2008, 11:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080423111556.GB3291@mithlond.arda.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080423092144.GA11368@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote (2008-04-23 05:21 -0400):
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:16:06AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > > Historically we did not favor one way or another for the general > > > purpose syntax. I think Jeff's proposed heuristics to favor > > > branch if a branch tip is pushed and tag if a tag is pushed makes > > > sense. > > > > OK, here is a cleaned up patch with tests. > > Oops, I forgot to mention: there is a broken test in t5516 that is > revealed by this change. The patch below should be applied before the > DWIM one.
I did some testing and your patches seem to work. I think push refspecs are frendlier now. :) It's great to see you guys taking users seriously and working on possible problems. Thanks!