Re: How to handle patch series conflicts
- From
- Stephen & Linda Smith <ischis2@cox.net>
- Date
- Oct 8, 2018, 01:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2206767.tHxkKBSiVS@thunderbird>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq1sa74pd5.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 2:16:06 PM MST Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Stephen & Linda Smith <ischis2@cox.net> writes: > > Junio - > > > > On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 10:27:26 AM MST Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > t7500-commit.sh > >> > t7501-commit.sh > >> > t7502-commit.sh > >> > t7509-commit.sh > >> > >> These seem to have organically grown and it is very likely that ones > >> later introduced were added more from laziness.
Junio - I've been working this but would like your opinion on 7500, 7501 and now 7510.
I note that the the commit tests have intermixed functionality. An example is signoff tests that are in the three tests I mentioned.
I've been tempted multiple times over the last week to just merge the tests into a single script, but that doesn't seem right either.
So would you prefer a single script? Would you prefer me to move tests around?
sps