Re: [PATCH 3/5] replace strbuf_expand_dict_cb() with strbuf_expand_step()
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jun 27, 2023, 08:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20230627082902.GI1226768@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <5ce9513b-d463-6f62-db4e-f9f60a7c3e9f@web.de>
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 10:42:26PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Avoid the overhead of setting up a dictionary and passing it via > strbuf_expand() to strbuf_expand_dict_cb() by using strbuf_expand_step() > in a loop instead. It requires explicit handling of %% and unrecognized > placeholders, but is more direct and simpler overall, and expands only > on demand.
Great. I think even replacing the dictionary with regular strbuf_expand() would be an improvement in terms of the on-demand loading. But I am happy to see it go all the way to the iterative version. :)
Your comment above does make me wonder if strbuf_expand_step() should be quietly handling "%%" itself. But I guess strbuf_expand() doesn't, and your branch.c quote-literal example probably would not want that behavior.
-Peff