Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] commit-graph: return 64-bit generation number
- From
Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 5, 2020, 05:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20201005052500.GA7276@Abhishek-Arch>
- In-Reply-To
- <857dsdvai2.fsf@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:48:05PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Hello, > > > Both Taylor Blau and Junio C Hamano agree that it is better to store > corrected commit date offsets and have overload handling to halve (to > reduce by 50%) the size of the GDAT chunk. I have not heard from > Derrick Stolee. > > It looks then that it is the way to go; as I said that you have > convinced me that variant 'c' (EDGE-like) is the best solution for > overflow handling. >
Great!
So I have implemented the variant 'c' and I am unsure whether my tests are exhaustive enough. Can you preview the commit "commit-graph: implement generation data chunk" [1] on the pull request?.
Apart from that, I am ready to publish the v4 to the mailing list.
[1]: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/676/commits/390973da1d744cbb8a08a3b99c991f6d04ae9baf
> Best, > -- > Jakub Narębski