Re: [PATCH 1/2] pkt-line: fix declaration of `set_packet_header()`

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > I do have a slight preference for going the _other_ way. There is no
> > need to mark the parameter as const in the definition. It is passed by
> > value, so nobody except the function body cares either way. And we have
> > many function bodies where value-passed parameters (or local variables!)
> > are not marked as const, even though they are only assigned to once.
> 
> That would be more like this patch, then?
> 
> -- >8 --
> Subject: pkt-line: drop 'const'-ness of a param to set_packet_header() 
> [..]