Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] builtin/config.c: support `--type=<type>` as preferred alias for `--type`

> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>
> > `git config` has long allowed the ability for callers to provide a 'type
> > specifier', which instructs `git config` to (1) ensure that incoming
> > values are satisfiable under that type, and (2) that outgoing values are
> > canonicalized under that type.
>
> Hmm, "satisfiable" is not the first word that comes to my mind to
> describe "when you give me a string 'frotz', we cannot take it as an
> integer".  s/are satisfiable under/can be interpreted as/ perhaps?

> > In another series, we propose to extend this functionality with
> > `--type=color` and `--default` to replace `--get-color`.
> >
> > However, we traditionally use `--color` to mean "colorize this output",
> > instead of "this value should be treated as a color".
>
> Makes sense.
>
> > Currently, `git config` does not support this kind of colorization, but
> > we should be careful to avoid inhabiting this option too soon, so that
> > `git config` can support `--type=color` (in the traditional sense) in
> > the future, if that is desired.
>
> Shouldn't the above `--color` instead?  That is, we avoid squatting
> on `--color` because we might later want to use it in the
> traditional way.  Also my reading stuttered around "inhabiting".  It
> might be just me, but perhaps s/inhabiting/squating on/?

> > In this patch, we support `--type=<int|bool|bool-or-int|...>` in
> > addition to `--int`, `--bool`, and etc. This allows the aforementioned
> > upcoming patch to support querying a color value with a default via
> > `--type=color --default=...`, without squandering `--color`.
>
> Good.
>
> > @@ -160,30 +158,39 @@ See also <<FILES>>.
> >  --list::
> >  	List all variables set in config file, along with their values.
> >
> > ---bool::
> > -	'git config' will ensure that the output is "true" or "false"
> > +--type <type>::
> > +  'git config' will ensure that any input or output is valid under the given
> > +  type constraint(s), and will canonicalize outgoing values in `<type>`'s
> > +  canonical form.
> > ++
> > +Valid `<type>`'s include:
> > ++
> > +- 'bool': canonicalize values as either "true" or "false".
> > +- 'int': canonicalize values as simple decimal numbers. An optional suffix of
> > +  'k', 'm', or 'g' will cause the value to be multiplied by 1024, 1048576, or
> > +  1073741824 prior to output.
>
> It is not a new problem introduced by this patch, but these place
> too much weight on the output side and may end up giving a flawed
> mental model to the readers, I am afraid.
>
> It's not like an 'int' value internally is "2k" and shown it as 2048
> when output.  In reality, we internalize it 2048 upon input and we
> do not do anything special when showing, no?  A 'bool' value given
> with a string 'no' internally becomes 0 upon input and is shown as
> 'false' upon output.
>
> I suspect s/prior to output/upon input/ may alleviate the issue
> quite a bit.