Re: [PATCH] config: use a static lock_file struct
- From
- Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
- Date
- Aug 29, 2017, 19:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170829190928.GD131745@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170829185850.tfmjoa5u5sfuwpgi@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On 08/29, Jeff King wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:53:41PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > It looks like the config code has a minor-ish leak. Patch to follow. > > Here it is. > > -- >8 -- > Subject: [PATCH] config: use a static lock_file struct > > When modifying git config, we xcalloc() a struct lock_file > but never free it. This is necessary because the tempfile > code (upon which the locking code is built) requires that > the resulting struct remain valid through the life of the > program. However, it also confuses leak-checkers like > valgrind because only the inner "struct tempfile" is still > reachable; no pointer to the outer lock_file is kept.
Is this just due to a limitation in the tempfile code? Would it be possible to improve the tempfile code such that we don't need to require that a tempfile, once created, is required to exist for the remaining life of the program?
Show 107 quoted lines
>
> Other code paths solve this by using a single static lock
> struct. We can do the same here, because we know that we'll
> only lock and modify one config file at a time (and
> assertions within the lockfile code will ensure that this
> remains the case).
>
> That removes a real leak (when we fail to free the struct
> after locking fails) as well as removes the valgrind false
> positive. It also means that doing N sequential
> config-writes will use a constant amount of memory, rather
> than leaving stale lock_files for each.
>
> Note that since "lock" is no longer a pointer, it can't be
> NULL anymore. But that's OK. We used that feature only to
> avoid calling rollback_lock_file() on an already-committed
> lock. Since the lockfile code keeps its own "active" flag,
> it's a noop to rollback an inactive lock, and we don't have
> to worry about this ourselves.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> ---
> In the long run we may want to drop the "tempfiles must remain forever"
> rule. This is certainly not the first time it has caused confusion or
> leaks. And I don't think it's a fundamental issue, just the way the code
> is written. But in the interim, this fix is probably worth doing.
>
> config.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
> index d0d8ce823a..1603f96e40 100644
> --- a/config.c
> +++ b/config.c
> @@ -2450,7 +2450,7 @@ int git_config_set_multivar_in_file_gently(const char *config_filename,
> {
> int fd = -1, in_fd = -1;
> int ret;
> - struct lock_file *lock = NULL;
> + static struct lock_file lock;
> char *filename_buf = NULL;
> char *contents = NULL;
> size_t contents_sz;
> @@ -2469,8 +2469,7 @@ int git_config_set_multivar_in_file_gently(const char *config_filename,
> * The lock serves a purpose in addition to locking: the new
> * contents of .git/config will be written into it.
> */
> - lock = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct lock_file));
> - fd = hold_lock_file_for_update(lock, config_filename, 0);
> + fd = hold_lock_file_for_update(&lock, config_filename, 0);
> if (fd < 0) {
> error_errno("could not lock config file %s", config_filename);
> free(store.key);
> @@ -2583,8 +2582,8 @@ int git_config_set_multivar_in_file_gently(const char *config_filename,
> close(in_fd);
> in_fd = -1;
>
> - if (chmod(get_lock_file_path(lock), st.st_mode & 07777) < 0) {
> - error_errno("chmod on %s failed", get_lock_file_path(lock));
> + if (chmod(get_lock_file_path(&lock), st.st_mode & 07777) < 0) {
> + error_errno("chmod on %s failed", get_lock_file_path(&lock));
> ret = CONFIG_NO_WRITE;
> goto out_free;
> }
> @@ -2639,28 +2638,19 @@ int git_config_set_multivar_in_file_gently(const char *config_filename,
> contents = NULL;
> }
>
> - if (commit_lock_file(lock) < 0) {
> + if (commit_lock_file(&lock) < 0) {
> error_errno("could not write config file %s", config_filename);
> ret = CONFIG_NO_WRITE;
> - lock = NULL;
> goto out_free;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * lock is committed, so don't try to roll it back below.
> - * NOTE: Since lockfile.c keeps a linked list of all created
> - * lock_file structures, it isn't safe to free(lock). It's
> - * better to just leave it hanging around.
> - */
> - lock = NULL;
> ret = 0;
>
> /* Invalidate the config cache */
> git_config_clear();
>
> out_free:
> - if (lock)
> - rollback_lock_file(lock);
> + rollback_lock_file(&lock);
> free(filename_buf);
> if (contents)
> munmap(contents, contents_sz);
> @@ -2669,7 +2659,7 @@ int git_config_set_multivar_in_file_gently(const char *config_filename,
> return ret;
>
> write_err_out:
> - ret = write_error(get_lock_file_path(lock));
> + ret = write_error(get_lock_file_path(&lock));
> goto out_free;
>
> }
> --
> 2.14.1.721.gc5bc1565f1
> -- Brandon Williams