Re: Why BLAKE2?
- From
- Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
- Date
- Feb 27, 2017, 14:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170227143747.GB297@x4>
- In-Reply-To
- <22708.8913.864049.452252@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
On 2017.02.27 at 13:00 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > For brevity I will write `SHA' for hashing with SHA-1, using current > unqualified object names, and `BLAKE' for hasing with BLAKE2b, using > H<hex> object names.
Why do you choose BLAKE2? SHA-2 is generally considered still fine and would be the obvious choice. And if you want to be adventurous then SHA-3 (Keccak) would be the next logical candidate.
-- Markus