Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info
- From
- Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
- Date
- Feb 23, 2016, 10:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20160223103253.GE5273@mwanda>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160223091740.GA3830@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
So this is the format for the first patch?
base commit: 0233b800c838ddda41db318ee396320b3c21a560
Can we change it to include the name of the public tree we are starting from?
applies-to: 0233b800c838 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git#master
Of course, my absolute prefered format would be:
applies-to: net-next 0233b800c838
I don't think that's possible though? I often write that sort of a line in my emails to Dave already.
Fengguang was suggesting something like this if we have to include unmerged patches:
applies-to: net-next 0233b800c838 private patchset 1 private patchset 2
I don't think git knows what a patchset is. We would have to include the subject line for each unmerged patch. I think we should only do that if there is a cover letter, otherwise the it's too noisy.
regards, dan carpenter