Re: [PATCH 04/22] rollback_lock_file(): set fd to -1
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 1, 2014, 19:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140401195930.GC21715@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1396367910-7299-5-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:58:12PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> When rolling back the lockfile, call close_lock_file() so that the > lock_file's fd field gets set back to -1. This could help prevent > confusion in the face of hypothetical future programming errors.
This also solves a race. We could be in the middle of rollback_lock_file when we get a signal, and double-close. It's probably not a big deal, though, since nobody could have opened a new descriptor in the interim that got the same number (so the second close will just fail silently).
Still, this seems like a definite improvement.
-Peff